As it turns out, we don't have to stop the MSM runaway train hellbent on declaring "implicit recognition." Hamas is doing that for us. Luckily, they don't want to be misunderstood or misrepresented.
For once, I can share some good examples from the media (via CAMERA):
In today's (June 28) Philadelphia Inquirer, reporter Michael Matza notes "Before anyone gets too excited about the Palestinian agreement initialed yesterday but not yet a done deal, consider what it does not do...'This is an internal agreement,' Palestinian lawmaker Abdul Rahman Zidan told the BBC. '... You will not find one word in the document clearly stating the recognition of Israel as a state.' Recognizing Israel's physical existence is different from recognizing its legitimacy. Furthermore, the document does not renounce violence as a political tool, as demanded by the international community. Instead, the document says it will 'focus resistance' on the occupied territories."
In today's Boston Globe, reporter Anne Barnard quotes Hamas leader Khalil Abu Leila saying: "Fatah wants from us more than what is in this document. They want Hamas to recognize Israel and be a copy of Fatah, something that will not happen...We will never recognize Israel."
The Globe also quoted Ziad Dayeh, described a Hamas official who worked on the deal, saying: "We are recognizing Israel's existence, not its legitimacy."
Today's Chicago Tribune quotes two other Hamas leaders. Reporter Joel Greenberg writes:
"The document included a clear clause referring to 'the non-recognition of the legitimacy of the occupation,' Abu Zuhri said. Hamas uses the term 'occupation' to refer to Israel [not just the territories]."
"Salah Bardaweel, the leader of the Hamas faction in parliament, said: 'We accept a state in [territory occupied] in 1967, but we did not say we accept two states.' "
Also today, in newspapers owned by McClatchy (formerly Knight Ridder), reporter Dion Nissenbaum quoted Khalid Abu Hilal, a senior Hamas leader, saying: "Our principles and statements are clear. We will never recognize Israel. We will recognize Israel only if it is far away."
Writing in today's Jerusalem Post, Khaled Abu Toameh quotes Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri saying: "We agreed to all the articles of the document without having to recognize Israel. This is a major achievement for Hamas because the agreement also allows us to pursue the resistance against Israel."
In an online report yesterday, BBC explained that "Hamas negotiators have denied earlier reports that the deal meant the militants would implicitly recognise Israel." The network continued:
"Palestinian minister Abdel Rahman Zeidan told the BBC the Hamas-Fatah document did not in any way recognise the state of Israel. 'There is no agreement between the Palestinians on specifically this phrase. You will not find one word in the document clearly stating the recognition of Israel as a state. Nobody has agreed to this. This was not on the table. This was not in the dialogue,' he said..."
"The BBC's James Reynolds in Gaza says that the central point of the joint manifesto is the creation of a Palestinian state on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Traditionally that is one half of a two-state solution, but the existing drafts of the deal make no mention of the second half of this solution - the state of Israel. This omission is deliberate, our correspondent says. While some have argued that this means Hamas tacitly accepts Israel's right to exist, it is becoming clear that that is not how Hamas sees it. Hamas negotiators have told the BBC that the entire state of Israel has been built on occupied Palestinian land. They believe that a Palestinian state on the West Bank and Gaza is a first step - not a final step."

According to CAMERA, the stragglers in the press would include the Washington Post and USA Today, neither of which cite any of the clear repudiations of Israel by Hamas leaders noted above.