Which is which?

Are these two points of view similar, or I am imagining it?

1) What has blind support for the Zionists by the US administration brought for the American people? It is regrettable that for the US administration, the interests of these occupiers supersedes the interests of the American people and of the other nations of the world.

2) The Bush administration is once again in the process of committing a major policy blunder in the Middle East, one that is liable to have disastrous consequences.... The Bush administration is actively supporting the Israeli government in its refusal to recognize a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas, which the US State Department considers a terrorist organization. This precludes any progress toward a peace settlement at a time when progress on the Palestinian problem could help avert a conflagration in the greater Middle East.

The first one is Ahmadinejad - "Message to the American People," November 2006.

The second is George Soros - in the current issue of The New York Review of Books.

UPDATE as I'm leaving, and in case you don't read the comments. Rick Richman adds a third:

Walt & Mearsheimer are even closer to Ahmadinejad, on the very first page of their pseudo-academic agitprop:

"The combination of unwavering U.S. support for Israel and the related effort to spread democracy throughout the region has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardized U.S. security. . . . Why has the United States been willing to set aside its own security in order to advance the interests of another state?"

Comments

[Rick Richman]

Walt & Mearsheimer are even closer to Ahmadinejad, on the very first page of their pseudo-academic agitprop: "The combination of unwavering U.S. support for Israel and the related effort to spread democracy throughout the region has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardized U.S. security. . . . Why has the United States been willing to set aside its own security in order to advance the interests of another state?"