April 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Send Money

to BtB

Tip Jar
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 09/2004

« Six Dollars will buy you a share of the New York Times Co. | Main | After having hesitated to use force (for months, years) Olmert warns HAMAS he will not hesitate to use force »

Thursday, 25 December 2008


No Ma'am, it's worse than that. By saying that it's "their rock-n-roll, their long hair, their love beads," and that they "have accepted Islam as an agent of *change*" (as though they have not been disciples of that false prophet for 1300 years already), THE NYT IS ACTIVELY *PREACHING* mOHAMMEDEANISM, *HERE* IN THE UNITED STATES. Don't they say that being a rebel, and working for some unspecified "change" is a good thing? Hasn't that theme been crammed down everybody's throats during this last election cycle for the last year--in the United States? And so, very subtily, that religion being touted as somehow "rebellious," and an "agent of change," in a manner that is intended for an American audience. How do you spell "barack HUSSEIN obama" as in, "we need to repair our image with the islamic world?" And well lo-and-behold, the grey harlot (a.k.a., the new york times) has also began to come out against coal, which is yet *another* point in al-barack obama's agenda.

The comments to this entry are closed.